Search Results

NVMBQ Nausea and Vomiting Management Barriers Questionnaire For cancer patients with chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting LICENSE THIS MEASURE Overview Language Availability Licensing Selected References Related Measures Overview Overview Below are the details for the NVMBQ measure: MEASURE NAME: Nausea and Vomiting Management Barriers Questionnaire (NVMBQ) VERSION: 1 NUMBER OF ITEMS: Patient version: 42; Provider version: 31 PATIENT POPULATION: Cancer patients 18 and older experiencing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting RECALL PERIOD: None RESPONSE SCALE: 4 point scale DATA COLLECTION: Paper and electronic ADMINISTRATION: Self-administration and interview when applicable SUBSCALE DOMAINS: Not available TIME FOR COMPLETION: 15-20 minutes SCORING: None RELATED MEASURES: FACIT-AD , FAIT-F , FACIT-D DOWNLOAD MEASURE IN ENGLISH DOWNLOAD SCORING DOCUMENT Language Availability Available translations of the NVMBQ can be obtained by registering for permission. Users are not permitted to translate the NVMBQ without permission from FACIT.org. Permission from FACIT.org to translate the NVMBQ may also be contingent upon timeline expectations and availability of FACIT staff. Translations must undergo a rigorous methodology under the guidance of FACIT.org which includes multiple translators, QA steps and cognitive interviews with patients. For commercial use, FACITtrans is the approved translation vendor to translate the FACIT measurement system. Please contact us for more information. VIEW AVAILABLE LANGUAGES Language Availability Licensing Licensing Licensing fees are assessed on a per trial/per measure basis for commercial use. There is no fee for use of the English version, but a license should be obtained. Non-commercial use is assessed on a case-by-case basis. Licensing fees are typically not applied to investigator-initiated research, students, or clinical use. To license an available version of this measure for commercial or non-commercial use, please complete our registration form . All of the information provided in the form will be kept strictly confidential. For questions, please contact us . LICENSE THIS MEASURE Selected References Selected References Haselmayer D, Salsman JM, Cella D, Koller A. Psychometric Evaluation of the Patient-Related Nausea and Vomiting Management Barriers Questionnaire. J Pain Symptom Manage . 2020 Aug;60(2):439-448. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.03.032. Epub 2020 Apr 8. PMID: 32276096. LICENSE THIS MEASURE Related Measures Related Measures FACIT-AD Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Abdominal Discomfort LEARN MORE FAIT-F Functional Assessment of Incontinence Therapy – Fecal LEARN MORE FACIT-D Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Diarrhea LEARN MORE

FACT-GOG-NTX-12 Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group - Neurotoxicity 12 Item Version For patients with Neurotoxicity LICENSE THIS MEASURE Overview Language Availability Licensing Selected References Related Measures Overview Overview The FACT/GOG-NTX provides a targeted assessment of symptoms of peripheral neuropathy, including sensory, motor, and auditory problems and cold sensitivity. This instrument has been demonstrated to be reliable and has internal consistency, content validity, and concurrent validity with sensitivity to change over time among various samples of cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. The psychometric properties of the 13-item FACT/GOG-NTX have been established with a large sample of clinical trial participants who received an oxaliplatin-based regimen for operable colorectal cancer. The FACT/GOG-NTX subscale yields a single aggregate score, which simplifies its use as a clinical trial endpoint. Individual items can be reviewed in the clinical setting to identify clinically significant symptomatology. MEASURE NAME: Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group - Neurotoxicity 12 Item Version (FACT/GOG-NTX-12) VERSION: 4 NUMBER OF ITEMS: 39 PATIENT POPULATION: Cancer patients 18 and older with neurotoxicity RECALL PERIOD: Past 7 days RESPONSE SCALE: 5 point Likert-type scale DATA COLLECTION: Paper and electronic ADMINISTRATION: Self-administration and interview when applicable SUBSCALE DOMAINS: Subscale domains: Physical Well-Being, Social/Family Well-Being, Emotional Well-Being, Functional Well-Being, Neurotoxicity Subscale TIME FOR COMPLETION: 10-15 minutes SCORING: Manual scoring template, some items are reverse scored. Subscale scores, total scores and TOI scores possible. RELATED MEASURES: FACT/GOG-NTX , FACT/GOG-NTX-4 , FACT/GOG-NTX-13 , FACT-Taxane DOWNLOAD MEASURE IN ENGLISH DOWNLOAD SCORING DOCUMENT Language Availability Available translations of the FACT/GOG-NTX-12 can be obtained by registering for permission. Users are not permitted to translate the FACT/GOG-NTX-12 without permission from FACIT.org. Permission from FACIT.org to translate the FACT/GOG-NTX-12 may also be contingent upon timeline expectations and availability of FACIT staff. Translations must undergo a rigorous methodology under the guidance of FACIT.org which includes multiple translators, QA steps and cognitive interviews with patients. For commercial use, FACITtrans is the approved translation vendor to translate the FACIT measurement system. Please contact us for more information. VIEW AVAILABLE LANGUAGES Language Availability Licensing Licensing Licensing fees are assessed on a per trial/per measure basis for commercial use. There is no fee for use of the English version, but a license should be obtained. Non-commercial use is assessed on a case-by-case basis. Licensing fees are typically not applied to investigator-initiated research, students, or clinical use. To license an available version of this measure for commercial or non-commercial use, please complete our registration form . All of the information provided in the form will be kept strictly confidential. For questions, please contact us . LICENSE THIS MEASURE Selected References Selected References Almadrones L, McGuire DB, Walczak JR, Florio CM, Tian C. Psychometric evaluation of two scales assessing functional status and peripheral neuropathy associated with chemotherapy for ovarian cancer: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Oncol Nur Forum 2004; 31:615-623. Bao T, Goloubeva O, Pelser C, Porter N, Primrose J, Hester L, Sadowska M, Lapidus R, Medeiros M, Lao L, Dorsey SG, Badros AZ. A pilot study of acupuncture in treating bortezomib-induced peripheral neuropathy in patients with multiple myeloma. Integr Cancer Ther. 2014; 13(5):396-404. Beijers A, Mols F, Dercksen W, Driessen C, Vreugdenhil G. Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy and impact on quality of life 6 months after treatment with chemotherapy. J Community Support Oncol. 2014; 12(11):401-6. Bennett MI, Smith BH, Torrance N, Potter J. The S-LANSS score for identifying pain of predominantly neuropathic origin: validation for use in clinical and postal research. J Pain. 2005; 6:149-58. Bonomi, A.E., Cella, D.D., Hahn, E.A., Bjordal, K., Sperner, B., Gangeri, L., Bergman, B., Willems, J., Hanquet, P., & Zittoun, R. Multilingual translation of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) quality of life measurement system. Quality of Life Research 1996; 5: 309-320. Calhoun EA, Welshman EE, Chang CH, Lurain JR, Fishman DA, Hunt TL, Cella D. Psychometric evaluation of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group – Neurotoxicity (FACT/GOG-NTX) questionnaire for patients receiving systemic chemotherapy. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2003; 13:741-748. Cella D, Peterman A, Hudgens S, Webster K, Socinski MA. Measuring the side effects of taxane therapy in oncology: The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Taxane (FACT-Taxane). Cancer 2003; 98:822-831. Cho J, Kang D, Lee JY, Kim K, Kim SJ. Impact of dose modification on intravenous bortezomib-induced peripheral neuropathy in multiple myeloma patients. Support Care Cancer. 2014; 22(10):2669-75. Driessen CM, de Kleine-Bolt KM, Vingerhoets AJ, Mols F, Vreugdenhil G. Assessing the impact of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity on the quality of life of cancer patients: the introduction of a new measure. Support Care Cancer. 2012; 20(4):877-81. Eremenco, S., Arnold, B., Cella, D. A comprehensive method for the translation and cross-cultural validation of health status questionnaires. Evaluation & the Health Professions 2005; 28(2): 212-232. Galantino ML, Callens ML, Cardena GJ, Piela NL, Mao JJ. Tai chi for well-being of breast cancer survivors with aromatase inhibitor-associated arthralgias: a feasibility study. Altern Ther Health Med. 2013; 19(6):38-44. Griffith KA, Merkies IS, Hill EE, Cornblath DR. Measures of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: a systematic review of psychometric properties. J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2010; 15(4):314-25. Griffith KA, Couture DJ, Zhu S, Pandya N, Johantgen ME, Cavaletti G, Davenport JM, Tanguay LJ, Choflet A, Milliron T, Glass E, Gambill N, Renn CL, Dorsey SG. Evaluation of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy using current perception threshold and clinical evaluations. Support Care Cancer. 2014; 22(5):1161-9. Guo Y, Jones D, Palmer JL, Forman A, Dakhil SR, Velasco MR, Weiss M, Gilman P, Mills GM, Noga SJ, Eng C, Overman MJ, Fisch MJ. Oral alpha-lipoic acid to prevent chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Support Care Cancer. 2014; 22(5):1223-31. Han X, Wang L, Shi H, Zheng G, He J, Wu W, Shi J, Wei G, Zheng W, Sun J, Huang H, Cai Z. Acupuncture combined with methylcobalamin for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in patients with multiple myeloma. BMC Cancer. 2017;17(1):40. Hausheer FH, Schilsky RL, Bain S, Berghorn EJ, Lieberman F. Diagnosis, management, and evaluation of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Semin Oncol. 2006; 33(1):15-49. Hershman DL, Weimer LH, Wang A, Kranwinkel G, Brafman L, Fuentes D, Awad D, Crew KD. Association between patient reported outcomes and quantitative sensory tests for measuring long-term neurotoxicity in breast cancer survivors treated with adjuvant paclitaxel chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011; 125(3):767-74. Huang HQ, Brady MF, Cella D, Fleming G. Validation and reduction of FACT/GOG-NTX subscale for platinum/paclitaxel-induced neurologic symptoms: a gynecologic oncology group study. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2007; 17:387-93. Kamimura T, Miyamoto T, Yokota N, Aoki T, Ito Y, Akashi K. Peripheral neuropathy exacerbated by lenalidomide in a patient with multiple myeloma. Intern Med. 2014; 53(15):1651-3. Kotaka M, Saito Y, Kato T, Satake H, Makiyama A, Tsuji Y, Shinozaki K, Fujiwara T, Mizushima T, Harihara Y, Nagata N, Kurihara N, Ando M, Kusakawa G, Sakai T, Uchida Y, Takamoto M, Kimoto S, Hyodo I. A placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized study of recombinant thrombomodulin (ART-123) to prevent oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2020 Sep 23. doi: 10.1007/s00280-020-04135-8. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 32965539. Kushner DM, Connor JP, Sanchez F, Volk M, Schink JC, Bailey HH, Harris LS, Stewart SL, Fine J, Hartenbach EM; For the Wisconsin Oncology Network. Weekly docetaxel and carboplatin for recurrent ovarian and peritoneal cancer: a phase II trial. Gynecol Oncol. 2007; 105:358-64. Land SR, Kopec JA, Cecchini RS, Ganz PA, Wieand HS, Colangelo LH, Murphy K, Kuebler JP, Seay TE, Needles BM, Bearden JD 3rd, Colman LK, Lanier KS, Pajon ER Jr, Cella D, Smith RE, O'Connell MJ, Costantino JP, Wolmark N. Neurotoxicity from oxaliplatin combined with weekly bolus fluorouracil and leucovorin as surgical adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II and III colon cancer: NSABP C-07. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25:2205-11. Long HJ 3rd, Monk BJ, Huang HQ, Grendys EC Jr, McMeekin DS, Sorosky J, Miller DS, Eaton LA, Fiorica JV; Gynecologic Oncology Group. Clinical results and quality of life analysis for the MVAC combination (methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin) in carcinoma of the uterine cervix: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 2006; 100:537-43. McArthur JH. The reliability and validity of the subjective peripheral neuropathy screen. J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 1998; 9:84-94. Moore DH, Donnelly J, McGuire WP, Almadrones L, Cella D, Herzog TJ, Waggoner SE. Limited access trial using amifostine for protection against cisplatin- and three-hour paclitaxel-induced neurotoxicity: A Phase II study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21:4207-4213. Ogawa K, Ogawa M, Nishijima K, Tsuda M, Nishimura G. Efficacy of contact needle therapy for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013; 2013:928129. Oldenburg J, Fosså SD, Dahl AA. Scale for chemotherapy-induced long-term neurotoxicity (SCIN): psychometrics, validation, and findings in a large sample of testicular cancer survivors. Qual Life Res. 2006; 15:791-800. Postma TJ, Aaronson NK, Heimans JJ, Muller MJ, Hildebrand JG, Delattre JY, Hoang-Xuan K, Lantéri-Minet M, Grant R, Huddart R, Moynihan C, Maher J, Lucey R; EORTC Quality of Life Group. The development of an EORTC quality of life questionnaire to assess chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: the QLQ-CIPN20. Eur J Cancer. 2005; 41:1135-9. Richardson PG, Briemberg H, Jagannath S, Wen PY, Barlogie B, Berenson J, Singhal S, Siegel DS, Irwin D, Schuster M, Srkalovic G, Alexanian R, Rajkumar SV, Limentani S, Alsina M, Orlowski RZ, Najarian K, Esseltine D, Anderson KC, Amato AA. Frequency, characteristics, and reversibility of peripheral neuropathy during treatment of advanced multiple myeloma with bortezomib. J Clin Oncol. 2006; 24:3113-20. Shimozuma K, Ohashi Y, Takeuchi A, Aranishi T, Morita S, Kuroi K, Ohsumi S, Makino H, Mukai H, Katsumata N, Sunada Y, Watanabe T, Hausheer FH. Feasibility and validity of the Patient Neurotoxicity Questionnaire during taxane chemotherapy in a phase III randomized trial in patients with breast cancer: N-SAS BC 02. Support Care Cancer. 2009; 17(12):1483-91. Spigel DR, Patel JD, Reynolds CH, Garon EB, Hermann RC, Govindan R, Olsen M, Winfree KB, Liu J, Guba SC, Socinski MA, Bonomi P. Patient-reported outcomes from POINTBREAK: The randomized, open-label, phase III study of pemetrexed (pem) + carboplatin (cb) + bevacizumab (bev) followed by maintenance pem + bev versus paclitaxel (pac) + cb + bev followed by maintenance bev in patients with stage IIIb or IV nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NS-NSCLC). J Clin Oncol. 2012; 30(34_suppl):53. [abstract] Vatandoust S, Joshi R, Pittman KB, Esterman A, Broadbridge V, Adams J, Singhal N, Yeend S, Price TJ. A descriptive study of persistent oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy in patients with colorectal cancer. Support Care Cancer. 2014; 22(2):513-8. Viala M, Bhakar AL, de la Loge C, van de Velde H, Esseltine D, Chang M, Dhawan R, Dubois D. Patient-reported outcomes helped predict survival in multiple myeloma using partial least squares analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007; 60:670-679. Weber B, Largillier R, Ray-Coquard I, Yazbek G, Meunier J, Alexandre J, Dauba J, Spaeth D, Delva R, Joly F, Pujade-Lauraine E, Copel L; GINECO group, France. A potentially neuroprotective role for erythropoietin with paclitaxel treatment in ovarian cancer patients: a prospective phase II GINECO trial. Support Care Cancer. 2013; 21(7):1947-54. Webster K., Cella D., Yost K. The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) measurement system: Properties applications, and interpretation. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2003; 1(1): 79-85. Yamazaki K, Nagase M, Tamagawa H, Ueda S, Tamura T, Murata K, Eguchi Nakajima T, Baba E, Tsuda M, Moriwaki T, Esaki T, Tsuji Y, Muro K, Taira K, Denda T, Funai S, Shinozaki K, Yamashita H, Sugimoto N, Okuno T, Nishina T, Umeki M, Kurimoto T, Takayama T, Tsuji A, Yoshida M, Hosokawa A, Shibata Y, Suyama K, Okabe M, Suzuki K, Seki N, Kawakami K, Sato M, Fujikawa K, Hirashima T, Shimura T, Taku K, Otsuji T, Tamura F, Shinozaki E, Nakashima K, Hara H, Tsushima T, Ando M, Morita S, Boku N, Hyodo I. Randomized phase III study of bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI and bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (WJOG4407G). Ann Oncol. 2016; 27(8):1539-46. Yost K.J., Eton D.T. Combining distribution- and anchor-based approaches to determine minimally important differences: The FACIT experience. Evaluation & the Health Professions 2005; 28(2): 172-191. Zanville NR, Nudelman KN, Smith DJ, Von Ah D, McDonald BC, Champion VL, Saykin AJ. Evaluating the impact of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy symptoms (CIPN-sx) on perceived ability to work in breast cancer survivors during the first year post-treatment. Support Care Cancer. 2016; 24(11):4779-89. Zelman DC, Gore M, Dukes E, Tai KS, Brandenburg N. Validation of a modified version of the brief pain inventory for painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2005; 29:401-10. LICENSE THIS MEASURE Related Measures Related Measures FACT/GOG-NTX Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group – Neurotoxicity LEARN MORE FACT/GOG-NTX-4 Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group - Neurotoxicity 4 Item Version LEARN MORE FACT-Taxane Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Taxane LEARN MORE

Download this measure in English. BACK FACT-Cx English Downloads Download PDF Download DOC

Download this measure in English. BACK FACT-Taxane English Downloads Download PDF Download DOC

FACT-RNT Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Radionuclide Therapy For patients receiving radionuclide therapy LICENSE THIS MEASURE Overview Language Availability Licensing Selected References Related Measures Overview Overview The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Radionuclide Therapy (FACT-RNT) is a standardized measure to monitor relevant symptoms and toxicities among prostate cancer patients in RNT trials and clinical settings. It was developed first by identifying relevant symptoms and toxicities by reviewing published trials and interviewing prostate cancer patients receiving radionuclide therapy (n=529), caregivers (n=514), and clinicians (n=511), then by selecting items for inclusion. The item list was refined with input from experts in RNTs and patient reported outcomes measures. MEASURE NAME: Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Radionuclide Therapy (FACT-RNT) VERSION: 1 NUMBER OF ITEMS: 15 PATIENT POPULATION: Patients receiving radionuclide therapy (RNT) for prostate cancer aged 18 years and older RECALL PERIOD: Past 7 days RESPONSE SCALE: 5 point Likert-type scale DATA COLLECTION: Paper and electronic ADMINISTRATION: Self-administration and interview when applicable SUBSCALE DOMAINS: RNT TIME FOR COMPLETION: 5-10 minutes SCORING: Manual scoring template, total score possible. RELATED MEASURES: FACT-P , NFPSI-17 , FPSI DOWNLOAD MEASURE IN ENGLISH DOWNLOAD SCORING DOCUMENT Language Availability Available translations of the FACT-RNT can be obtained by registering for permission. Users are not permitted to translate the FACT-RNT without permission from FACIT.org. Permission from FACIT.org to translate the FACT-RNT may also be contingent upon timeline expectations and availability of FACIT staff. Translations must undergo a rigorous methodology under the guidance of FACIT.org which includes multiple translators, QA steps and cognitive interviews with patients. For commercial use, FACITtrans is the approved translation vendor to translate the FACIT measurement system. Please contact us for more information. VIEW AVAILABLE LANGUAGES Language Availability Licensing Licensing Licensing fees are assessed on a per trial/per measure basis for commercial use. There is no fee for use of the English version, but a license should be obtained. Non-commercial use is assessed on a case-by-case basis. Licensing fees are typically not applied to investigator-initiated research, students, or clinical use. To license an available version of this measure for commercial or non-commercial use, please complete our registration form . All of the information provided in the form will be kept strictly confidential. For questions, please contact us . LICENSE THIS MEASURE Selected References Selected References Gudenkauf LM, Chavez M, Maconi ML, Geiss C, Seyedroudbari A, Thin P, Hoogland AI, Nguyen K, Murthy V, Armstrong WR, Komrokji K, Oswald LB, Jim HSL, El-Haddad G, Fendler WP, Herrmann K, Cella D, Czernin J, Hofman MS, Dicker AP, Calais J, Tagawa ST, Gonzalez BD. Developing a novel patient reported outcomes measure for prostate cancer patients receiving radionuclide therapy. J Nucl Med. 2023 Jan 12:jnumed.122.264946. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.122.264946. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 36635088. LICENSE THIS MEASURE Related Measures Related Measures FACT-P Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Prostate LEARN MORE NFPSI-17 NCCN/FACT Prostate Cancer Symptom Index - 17 Item Version LEARN MORE FPSI FACT Prostate Cancer Symptom Index - 7 Item Version LEARN MORE

FACT-Lym Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Lymphoma For patients with Lymphoma (NHL) LICENSE THIS MEASURE Overview Language Availability Licensing Selected References Related Measures Overview Overview The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) was developed to address health-related quality-of-life issues for NHL patients. Items for the FACT lymphoma subscale were generated from healthcare provider interviews, published literature, and content validity patient interviews. The scale was validated on a sample of 84 NHL patients, with additional measures at baseline (T1), 3–7 days (T2), and 8–12 weeks (T3). Item correlations, expert relevance ratings, and patient input on content shortened the initial 22-item lymphoma subscale to 15 items. The validation sample included 56% female, 76.2% white, 60% indolent disease, and 85% receiving treatment. Internal consistency coefficients for the subscale (.79, .85, and .84 T1–T3) and test-retest stability (.84) indicated good reliability. Correlations between the lymphoma scale and SF-36 physical (𝑟 = .62) and mental (𝑟 = .48) summary scores reflect concurrent validity. Responsiveness to ECOG performance status and treatment status exceeded established FACT subscale scores. The subscale differentiated patients’ retrospective ratings of change in each of the three groups (better; unchanged; worse), 𝑃 < 0.001. MEASURE NAME: Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) VERSION: 4 NUMBER OF ITEMS: 42 PATIENT POPULATION: Lymphoma patients 18 years and older RECALL PERIOD: Past 7 days RESPONSE SCALE: 5 point Likert-type scale DATA COLLECTION: Paper and electronic ADMINISTRATION: Self-administration and interview when applicable SUBSCALE DOMAINS: Physical Well-Being, Social/Family Well-Being, Emotional Well-Being, Functional Well-Being, Lymphoma Subscale TIME FOR COMPLETION: 10-15 minutes SCORING: Manual scoring template, some items are reverse scored. Subscale scores, total scores and TOI scores possible. SAS/SPSS algorithms available. RELATED MEASURES: NFLymSI-18 , FACT-Leu , FACT-G DOWNLOAD MEASURE IN ENGLISH DOWNLOAD SCORING DOCUMENT Language Availability Available translations of the FACT-Lym can be obtained by registering for permission. Users are not permitted to translate the FACT-Lym without permission from FACIT.org. Permission from FACIT.org to translate the FACT-Lym may also be contingent upon timeline expectations and availability of FACIT staff. Translations must undergo a rigorous methodology under the guidance of FACIT.org which includes multiple translators, QA steps and cognitive interviews with patients. For commercial use, FACITtrans is the approved translation vendor to translate the FACIT measurement system. Please contact us for more information. VIEW AVAILABLE LANGUAGES Language Availability Licensing Licensing Licensing fees are assessed on a per trial/per measure basis for commercial use. There is no fee for use of the English version, but a license should be obtained. Non-commercial use is assessed on a case-by-case basis. Licensing fees are typically not applied to investigator-initiated research, students, or clinical use. To license an available version of this measure for commercial or non-commercial use, please complete our registration form . All of the information provided in the form will be kept strictly confidential. For questions, please contact us . LICENSE THIS MEASURE Selected References Selected References Hlubocky, F., Webster, K., Cashy, J., Beaumont, J., & Cella, D. The development and validation of a measure of health-related quality of life for non-hodgkin’s lymphoma: the functional assessment of cancer therapy—lymphoma (FACT-Lym). Lymphoma 2013; Article ID 147176. doi: 10.1155/2013/147176. Hlubocky, F., Webster, K., Beaumont, J., Cashy, J., Paul, D., Abernathy, A., Syrjala, K., Von Roenn, J., & Cella, D. A preliminary study of a health related quality of life assessment of priority symptoms in advanced lymphoma: the National Comprehensive Cancer Network-Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lymphoma Symptom Index. Leukemia & Lymphoma 2013; 54(9): 1942-1946. doi: 10.3109/10428194.2012.76297. Pettengell, R., Donatti, C., Hoskin, P., Poynton, C., Kettle, P., Hancock, B., Johnson, S., Dyer, M., Rule, S., Walker, M., & Wild, D. The impact of follicular lymphoma on health-related quality of life. Annals of Oncology 2008; 19: 570–576. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdm543. Cheson B.D., Trask P.C., Gribben J.G., et al. Health-related quality of life and symptoms in patients with rituximab-refractory indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma treated in the phase III GADOLIN study with obinutuzumab plus bendamustine versus bendamustine alone. Ann Hematol. 2017;96(2):253-259. doi:10.1007/s00277-016-2878-5. Bonomi, A.E., Cella, D.D., Hahn, E.A., Bjordal, K., Sperner, B., Gangeri, L., Bergman, B., Willems, J., Hanquet, P., & Zittoun, R. Multilingual translation of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) quality of life measurement system. Quality of Life Research 1996; 5: 309-320. Eremenco, S., Arnold, B., Cella, D. A comprehensive method for the translation and cross-cultural validation of health status questionnaires. Evaluation & the Health Professions 2005; 28(2): 212-232. Webster K., Cella D., Yost K. The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) measurement system: Properties applications, and interpretation. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2003; 1(1): 79-85. Yost K.J., Eton D.T. Combining distribution- and anchor-based approaches to determine minimally important differences: The FACIT experience. Evaluation & the Health Professions 2005; 28(2): 172-191. LICENSE THIS MEASURE Related Measures Related Measures NFLymSI-18 National Comprehensive Cancer Network/Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Cancer Symptom Index - 18 Item Version LEARN MORE FACT-Leu Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Leukemia LEARN MORE FACT-G Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – General LEARN MORE

FACT-P Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Prostate For patients with Prostate cancer LICENSE THIS MEASURE Overview Language Availability Licensing Selected References Related Measures Overview Overview The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Prostate (FACT-P) is a meaningful component of QOL evaluation in men undergoing therapy for prostate cancer. It was developed and tested in three independent samples: a subscale development sample (n = 43), validity sample 1 (n = 34), and validity sample 2 (n = 96). MEASURE NAME: Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Prostate (FACT-P) VERSION: 4 NUMBER OF ITEMS: 39 PATIENT POPULATION: Prostate cancer patients 18 years and older RECALL PERIOD: Past 7 days RESPONSE SCALE: 5 point Likert-type scale DATA COLLECTION: Paper and electronic ADMINISTRATION: Self-administration and interview when applicable SUBSCALE DOMAINS: Physical Well-Being, Social/Family Well-Being, Emotional Well-Being, Functional Well-Being, Prostate Cancer Subscale TIME FOR COMPLETION: 10-15 minutes SCORING: Manual scoring template, some items are reverse scored. Subscale scores, total scores and TOI scores possible. SAS/SPSS algorithms available. RELATED MEASURES: FPSI , NFPSI-17 , FACT-RNT DOWNLOAD MEASURE IN ENGLISH DOWNLOAD SCORING DOCUMENT Language Availability Available translations of the FACT-P can be obtained by registering for permission. Users are not permitted to translate the FACT-P without permission from FACIT.org. Permission from FACIT.org to translate the FACT-P may also be contingent upon timeline expectations and availability of FACIT staff. Translations must undergo a rigorous methodology under the guidance of FACIT.org which includes multiple translators, QA steps and cognitive interviews with patients. For commercial use, FACITtrans is the approved translation vendor to translate the FACIT measurement system. Please contact us for more information. VIEW AVAILABLE LANGUAGES Language Availability Licensing Licensing Licensing fees are assessed on a per trial/per measure basis for commercial use. There is no fee for use of the English version, but a license should be obtained. Non-commercial use is assessed on a case-by-case basis. Licensing fees are typically not applied to investigator-initiated research, students, or clinical use. To license an available version of this measure for commercial or non-commercial use, please complete our registration form . All of the information provided in the form will be kept strictly confidential. For questions, please contact us . LICENSE THIS MEASURE Selected References Selected References Beaumont, J., Butt, Z., Li, R., & Cella, D. Meaningful Differences and Validity for the NCCN/FACT-P Symptom Index: An analysis of the ALSYMPCA data. Cancer 2019; 125(11): 1877-1885. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31973. Beer, T., Miller, K., Tombal, B., Cella, D., DePhung, Holmstrom, S., Ivanescu, C., Skaltsa, K., & Naidoo, S. The association between health-related quality-of-life scores and clinical outcomes in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients: Exploratory analyses of AFFIRM and PREVAIL studies. European Journal of Cancer 2017; 87: 21-29. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.09.035. Cella, D., Petrylak, D., Fishman, M., Teigland, C., Young, J., & Mulani, P. Role of quality of life in men with metastatic hormone-refactory prostate cancer: How does Astrsentan influence quality of life? European Urology 2006; 49: 781-789. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.12.05. Cella, D., Nichol, M., Eton, D., Nelson, J., & Mulani, P. Estimating clinically meaningful changes for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Prostate: Results from a clinical trial of patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Value in Health 2009; 12(1): 124-129. Esper, P., Mo, F., Chodak, G., Sinner, M., Cella, D., & Pienta, K.J. Measuring quality of life in men with prostate cancer using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) instrument. Urology 1997; 50(6): 920-928. Orakwe, D., Tijani, K., Jeje, E., Ogunjimi, M., Rufus, W., & Alab, T. Bilateral Subcapsular Orchiectomy versus Bilateral Total Orchiectomy: Comparison of the Quality of Life Post‑Orchiectomy. Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal 2018; 25(1): 43-47. doi: 10.4103/npmj.npmj_169_17. Parker, C., Nilsson, s., Heinrich, D., Helle, S., O’Sullivan, J., Fosså, S., Chodacki, A., Wiechno, P., Logue, J., Seke, M., Widmark, A., Johannessen, D., Hoskin, P., Bottomley, D., James, N., Solberg, A., Syndikus, I., Kliment, J., Wedel, S., Boehmer, S., Dall’Oglio, M., Franzén, L., Coleman, R., Vogelzang, N., O’Bryan-Tear, C., Staudacher, K.., Garcia-Vargas, J., Shan, M., Bruland, Ø.., & Sartor, O. Alpha Emitter Radium-223 and Survival in Metastatic Prostate Cancer. The New England Journal of Medicine 2013; 369(3): 213-223. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa121375. Saad, F., Cella, D., Basch, E., Hadaschik, B., Mainwaring, P., Oudard, S., Graff, J., McQuarrie, K., Li, S., Hudgens, S. Lawson, J., Lopez-Gitlitz, A., Yu, M., Smith, M., & Small, E. Effect of apalutamide on health-related quality of life in patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: an analysis of the SPARTAN randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. The Lancet Oncology 2018; 19(10):1404-1416. doi: 10.1016/ S1470-2045(18)30567-9. Sullivan, P. Nelson, J., Mulani, P., & Slee, D. Quality of life as a potential predictor for morbidity and mortality in patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Quality of Life Research 2006; 15: 1297–1306. doi: 10.1007/s11136-006-0003-2. Vashistha, V., Singh, B., Kaur, S., Prokop, L., & Kaushik, D. The Effects of Exercise on Fatigue, Quality of Life, and Psychological Function for Men with Prostate Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analyses. European Urology Focus 2016; 2(3): 284-295. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2016.02.011. Victorson, D., Beaumont, J, Rosenbloom, S., Shevrin, D, & Cella, D. Efficient assessment of the most important symptoms in advanced prostate cancer: The NCCN/FACT-P symptom index. Psycho-Oncology 2011; 20(9): 977-983. doi: 10.1002/pon.1817. Bonomi, A.E., Cella, D.D., Hahn, E.A., Bjordal, K., Sperner, B., Gangeri, L., Bergman, B., Willems, J., Hanquet, P., & Zittoun, R. Multilingual translation of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) quality of life measurement system. Quality of Life Research 1996; 5: 309-320. Eremenco, S., Arnold, B., Cella, D. A comprehensive method for the translation and cross-cultural validation of health status questionnaires. Evaluation & the Health Professions 2005; 28(2): 212-232. Webster K., Cella D., Yost K. The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) measurement system: Properties applications, and interpretation. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2003; 1(1): 79-85. Yost K.J., Eton D.T. Combining distribution- and anchor-based approaches to determine minimally important differences: The FACIT experience. Evaluation & the Health Professions 2005; 28(2): 172-191. LICENSE THIS MEASURE Related Measures Related Measures FPSI Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Prostate Cancer Symptom Index - 7 Item Version LEARN MORE NFPSI-17 National Comprehensive Cancer Network/Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Prostate Cancer Symptom Index - 17 Item Version LEARN MORE FACT-RNT Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Radionuclide Therapy LEARN MORE

FACT-O Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Ovarian For patients with Ovarian cancer LICENSE THIS MEASURE Overview Language Availability Licensing Selected References Related Measures Overview Overview The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Ovarian (FACT-O) provides a reliable and valid assessment of the quality of life of women with ovarian cancer, and is appropriate as a brief quality of life assessment in clinical trials and descriptive studies. It was initially validated with 232 ovarian cancer patients attending an outpatient gynecologic oncology clinic, who completed the measure at baseline. The patients’ FACT-O scores were then compared with their performance status, disease stage, treatment status, and other factors hypothesized to be related to quality of life. Patients received a second measure either one week after baseline to assess the instrument’s test-retest reliability and/or two months after baseline to evaluate its sensitivity to change in performance status. Overall, the subscales correlated with other measures as expected; all correlations were in the hypothesized direction. Patients with advanced disease, poor performance status, and who were receiving active treatment had lower scores on physical, functional, and ovarian cancer-specific scales. The total FACT-O and emotional well-being scores were lower for patients with poor performance status and patients in active treatment. The FACT-O total and all subscale scores except emotional well-being were sensitive to decreases in performance status. MEASURE NAME: Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Ovarian (FACT-O) VERSION: 4 NUMBER OF ITEMS: 39 PATIENT POPULATION: Ovarian cancer patients 18 years and older RECALL PERIOD: Past 7 days RESPONSE SCALE: 5 point Likert-type scale DATA COLLECTION: Paper and electronic ADMINISTRATION: Self-administration and interview when applicable SUBSCALE DOMAINS: Physical Well-Being, Social/Family Well-Being, Emotional Well-Being, Functional Well-Being, Ovarian Cancer Subscale TIME FOR COMPLETION: 10-15 minutes SCORING: Manual scoring template, some items are reverse scored. Subscale scores, total scores and TOI scores possible. SAS/SPSS algorithms available. RELATED MEASURES: FOSI , NFOSI-18 , FACT-Cx DOWNLOAD MEASURE IN ENGLISH DOWNLOAD SCORING DOCUMENT Language Availability Available translations of the FACT-O can be obtained by registering for permission. Users are not permitted to translate the FACT-O without permission from FACIT.org. Permission from FACIT.org to translate the FACT-O may also be contingent upon timeline expectations and availability of FACIT staff. Translations must undergo a rigorous methodology under the guidance of FACIT.org which includes multiple translators, QA steps and cognitive interviews with patients. For commercial use, FACITtrans is the approved translation vendor to translate the FACIT measurement system. Please contact us for more information. VIEW AVAILABLE LANGUAGES Language Availability Licensing Licensing Licensing fees are assessed on a per trial/per measure basis for commercial use. There is no fee for use of the English version, but a license should be obtained. Non-commercial use is assessed on a case-by-case basis. Licensing fees are typically not applied to investigator-initiated research, students, or clinical use. To license an available version of this measure for commercial or non-commercial use, please complete our registration form . All of the information provided in the form will be kept strictly confidential. For questions, please contact us . LICENSE THIS MEASURE Selected References Selected References Basen-Engquist, K., Bodurka-Bevers D., Fitzgerald M., Webster K., Cella D., Hu S., & Gershenson D. Reliability and Validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Ovarian. The Journal of Clinical Oncology 2001; 19(6): 1809-1817. doi: 10.1200/jco.2001.19.6.1809. Bonomi, A.E., Cella, D.D., Hahn, E.A., Bjordal, K., Sperner, B., Gangeri, L., Bergman, B., Willems, J., Hanquet, P., & Zittoun, R. Multilingual translation of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) quality of life measurement system. Quality of Life Research 1996; 5: 309-320. Eremenco, S., Arnold, B., Cella, D. A comprehensive method for the translation and cross-cultural validation of health status questionnaires. Evaluation & the Health Professions 2005; 28(2): 212-232. Webster K., Cella D., Yost K. The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) measurement system: Properties applications, and interpretation. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2003; 1(1): 79-85. Yost K.J., Eton D.T. Combining distribution- and anchor-based approaches to determine minimally important differences: The FACIT experience. Evaluation & the Health Professions 2005; 28(2): 172-191. LICENSE THIS MEASURE Related Measures Related Measures FOSI Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Ovarian Cancer Symptom Index - 8 Item Version LEARN MORE NFOSI-18 National Comprehensive Cancer Network/Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Ovarian Cancer Symptom Index - 18 Item Version LEARN MORE FACT-Cx Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Cervix LEARN MORE

FACT-An Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Anemia For patients with Anemia/Fatigue LICENSE THIS MEASURE Overview Language Availability Licensing Selected References Related Measures Overview Overview The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Anemia (FACT-An) contains 20 items related to symptoms and concerns of patients with anemia along with the 27-item Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). Thirteen of the 20 items deal with fatigue, while the remaining 7 cover other concerns related to anemia. Using semi-structured interviews with 14 anemic oncology patients and 5 oncology experts, two instruments were produced: The FACIT-Fatigue and the FACT-Anemia. These measures were then tested with a second sample of 50 cancer patients with hemoglobin levels ranging from 7 to 15.9 g/dL. The 47-item FAC7-An scores were found to be stable (test-retest r = 0.87) and internally consistent (coefficient alpha range= 0. 95-0. 96). The symptom-specific subscales also showed good stability (test-retest r range = 0.84-0.90), and the Fatigue subscale showed strong internal consistency (coefficient alpha range = 0. 93-0. 95). Internal consistency of the miscellaneous non-fatigue items was lower but acceptable (alpha range = 0.5 9-0. 70), particularly in light of their strong relationship to patient-rated performance status and hemoglobin level. Convergent and discriminant validity testing revealed a significant positive relationship with other known measures of fatigue, a significant negative relationship with vigor, and a predicted lack of relationship with social desirability. The FACT-An is useful measure of quality of life in cancer treatment, adding more focus to the problems of fatigue and anemia. MEASURE NAME: Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Anemia (FACT-An) VERSION: 4 NUMBER OF ITEMS: 47 PATIENT POPULATION: Cancer patients 18 years and older with anemia RECALL PERIOD: Past 7 days RESPONSE SCALE: 5 point Likert-type scale DATA COLLECTION: Paper and electronic ADMINISTRATION: Self-administration and interview when applicable SUBSCALE DOMAINS: Physical Well-Being, Social/Family Well-Being, Emotional Well-Being, Functional Well-Being, Anemia Subscale TIME FOR COMPLETION: 10-15 minutes SCORING: Manual scoring template, some items are reverse scored. Subscale scores, total scores and TOI scores possible. SAS/SPSS algorithms available. RELATED MEASURES: FACIT-Fatigue , FACIT-F , PROMIS SF v1.0 – Fatigue 13a DOWNLOAD MEASURE IN ENGLISH DOWNLOAD SCORING DOCUMENT Language Availability Available translations of the FACT-An can be obtained by registering for permission. Users are not permitted to translate the FACT-An without permission from FACIT.org. Permission from FACIT.org to translate the FACT-An may also be contingent upon timeline expectations and availability of FACIT staff. Translations must undergo a rigorous methodology under the guidance of FACIT.org which includes multiple translators, QA steps and cognitive interviews with patients. For commercial use, FACITtrans is the approved translation vendor to translate the FACIT measurement system. Please contact us for more information. VIEW AVAILABLE LANGUAGES Language Availability Licensing Licensing Licensing fees are assessed on a per trial/per measure basis for commercial use. There is no fee for use of the English version, but a license should be obtained. Non-commercial use is assessed on a case-by-case basis. Licensing fees are typically not applied to investigator-initiated research, students, or clinical use. To license an available version of this measure for commercial or non-commercial use, please complete our registration form . All of the information provided in the form will be kept strictly confidential. For questions, please contact us . LICENSE THIS MEASURE Selected References Selected References Casadevall, N., Durieux, P., Dubois, S., Hemery, F., Lepage, E., Quarré, M., Damaj, G., Giraudier, S., Guerci, A., Laurent, G., Dombret, H., Chomienne, C., Ribrag, V., Stamatoullas, A., Marie, J., Vekhoff, A., Maloisel, F., Navarro, R., Dreyfus, F., & Fenaux, P. Health, economic, and quality-of-life effects of erythropoietin and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes: a randomized, controlled trial. Blood 2004; 104(2): 321-327. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-07-2252. Greenberg, P., Sun, Z., Miller, K., Bennett, J., Tallman, M., Dewald, G., van der Jagt, R., Houston, J., Thomas, M., Cella, D., & Rowe, J. Treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes patients with erythropoietin with or without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: results of a prospective randomized phase III trial by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (E1996). Blood 2009; 114(12): 2393–2400. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-03-211797. Mesa, R., Niblack, J., Wadleigh, M., Verstovsek, S., Camoriano, J., Barnes, S., Tan, A., Atherton, P., Sloan, J., Tefferi, A. The Burden of Fatigue and Quality of Life in Myeloproliferative Disorders (MPDs). An International Internet-Based Survey of 1179 MPD Patients. Cancer 2007; 109(1): 68-76. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22365. Pinchon, D., Stanworth, S., Dore ´e, C., Brunskill, S., & Norfolk, D. Quality of life and use of red cell transfusion in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. A systematic review. American Journal of Hematology 2009; 84(10):671-677. doi: 10.1002/ajh.21503. Spiriti. M., Latagliata, R., Niscola, P., Cortelezzi. A., Francesconi. M., Ferrari, D., Volpe, E., Clavio, M., Grossi. A., Reyes, M., Musto, P., Mitra, M., Azzarà, A., Pagnini, D., D’Arena, G., Spadano, A., Balleari, E., Pecorari, P., Capochiani, E., De Biasi, E., Perego, D., Monarca, B., Pisani, F., Scaramella, G., & Petti, M. Impact of a new dosing regimen of epoetin alfa on quality of life and anemia in patients with low-risk myelodysplastic syndrome. Ann Hematol 2005; 84: 167–176. doi: 10.1007/s00277-004-0961-9. Steensma, D., Heptinstall, K., Johnson, V., Novotny, P., Sloan, J., Camoriano, J., Niblack, J., Bennett, J., & Mesa, R. Common troublesome symptoms and their impact on quality of life in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS): Results of a large internet-based survey. Leukemia Research 2008; 32: 691-698. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2007.10.015. Trudeau, J.J., He, J., Rose, E. et al. Content validity of patient-reported outcomes for use in lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. J Patient Rep Outcomes 4, 69 (2020). doi.org/10.1186/s41687-020-00235-4. Yellen, S.B., Cella, D.F., Webster, K.A., Blendowski, C., & Kaplan, E. Measuring fatigue and other anemia-related symptoms with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) Measurement System. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 1997; 13(2): 63-74. Bonomi, A.E., Cella, D.D., Hahn, E.A., Bjordal, K., Sperner, B., Gangeri, L., Bergman, B., Willems, J., Hanquet, P., & Zittoun, R. Multilingual translation of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) quality of life measurement system. Quality of Life Research 1996; 5: 309-320. Eremenco, S., Arnold, B., Cella, D. A comprehensive method for the translation and cross-cultural validation of health status questionnaires. Evaluation & the Health Professions 2005; 28(2): 212-232. Webster K., Cella D., Yost K. The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) measurement system: Properties applications, and interpretation. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2003; 1(1): 79-85. Yost K.J., Eton D.T. Combining distribution- and anchor-based approaches to determine minimally important differences: The FACIT experience. Evaluation & the Health Professions 2005; 28(2): 172-191. LICENSE THIS MEASURE Related Measures Related Measures FACIT-Fatigue Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy – Fatigue Scale LEARN MORE FACIT-F Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy – Fatigue LEARN MORE PROMIS SF v1.0 – Fatigue 13a Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Short Form - Fatigue 13a LEARN MORE

FACT-C Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Colorectal For patients with Colorectal cancer LICENSE THIS MEASURE Overview Language Availability Licensing Selected References Related Measures Overview Overview The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Colorectal (FACT-C) is a measure which assesses the quality-of-life of colorectal cancer patients. This self-report instrument combines specific concerns related to colorectal cancer with those that are common to all cancer patients. It has been shown to have good internal consistency, reliability and concurrent validity, as well as an ability to distinguish between groups based on functional status and extent of disease. The FACT-C has also been found to be sensitive to changes in functional status and the colorectal cancer-specific items have been found to have adequate convergent and divergent validity. MEASURE NAME: Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Colorectal (FACT-C) VERSION: 4 NUMBER OF ITEMS: 36 PATIENT POPULATION: Colorectal cancer patients 18 years and older RECALL PERIOD: Past 7 days RESPONSE SCALE: 5 point Likert-type scale DATA COLLECTION: Paper and electronic ADMINISTRATION: Self-administration and interview when applicable SUBSCALE DOMAINS: Physical Well-Being, Social/Family Well-Being, Emotional Well-Being, Functional Well-Being, Colorectal Cancer Subscale TIME FOR COMPLETION: 10-15 minutes SCORING: Manual scoring template, some items are reverse scored. Subscale scores, total scores and TOI scores possible. SAS/SPSS algorithms available. RELATED MEASURES: FCSI , NFCSI-19 , FACT-G DOWNLOAD MEASURE IN ENGLISH DOWNLOAD SCORING DOCUMENT Language Availability Available translations of the FACT-C can be obtained by registering for permission. Users are not permitted to translate the FACT-C without permission from FACIT.org. Permission from FACIT.org to translate the FACT-C may also be contingent upon timeline expectations and availability of FACIT staff. Translations must undergo a rigorous methodology under the guidance of FACIT.org which includes multiple translators, QA steps and cognitive interviews with patients. For commercial use, FACITtrans is the approved translation vendor to translate the FACIT measurement system. Please contact us for more information. VIEW AVAILABLE LANGUAGES Language Availability Licensing Licensing Licensing fees are assessed on a per trial/per measure basis for commercial use. There is no fee for use of the English version, but a license should be obtained. Non-commercial use is assessed on a case-by-case basis. Licensing fees are typically not applied to investigator-initiated research, students, or clinical use. To license an available version of this measure for commercial or non-commercial use, please complete our registration form . All of the information provided in the form will be kept strictly confidential. For questions, please contact us . LICENSE THIS MEASURE Selected References Selected References Chandramohan, K., Pandey, M., KR, S., Sebastian, P., & Thomas, B. Reliability of the Malayalam FACT-Colorectal and predictors of QOL in patients with colorectal carcinoma. World Journal of Psychosocial Oncology 2012; 1: 19-28. Lynch, B., Cerin, E., Owen, N., Hawkes, A., & Aitken, J. Prospective Relationships of Physical Activity With Quality of Life Among Colorectal Cancer Survivors. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2008; 26(27): 4480-4487. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.7917. Ward, W., Hahn, E., Mo, F., Hernandez, L., Tulsky, D., & Cella, D. Reliability and Validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C) Quality of Life Instrument. Quality of Life Research , 1999; 8(3): 181-195. Bonomi, A.E., Cella, D.D., Hahn, E.A., Bjordal, K., Sperner, B., Gangeri, L., Bergman, B., Willems, J., Hanquet, P., & Zittoun, R. Multilingual translation of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) quality of life measurement system. Quality of Life Research 1996; 5: 309-320. Eremenco, S., Arnold, B., Cella, D. A comprehensive method for the translation and cross-cultural validation of health status questionnaires. Evaluation & the Health Professions 2005; 28(2): 212-232. Webster K., Cella D., Yost K. The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) measurement system: Properties applications, and interpretation. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2003; 1(1): 79-85. Yost K.J., Eton D.T. Combining distribution- and anchor-based approaches to determine minimally important differences: The FACIT experience. Evaluation & the Health Professions 2005; 28(2): 172-191. LICENSE THIS MEASURE Related Measures Related Measures FCSI Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Colorectal Cancer Symptom Index - 9 Item Version LEARN MORE NFCSI-19 National Comprehensive Cancer Network/Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Colorectal Cancer Symptom Index - 19 Item Version LEARN MORE FACT-G Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – General LEARN MORE

BACK FACT-BMT Languages Arabic Bengali Bulgarian Chinese - Simplified Chinese - Traditional Croatian Czech Danish Dutch English Farsi Finnish French German Greek Gujarati Hebrew Hindi Hungarian Italian Japanese Kannada Korean Lithuanian Malayalam Marathi Norwegian Polish Portuguese Punjabi Romanian Russian Slovak Spanish Swedish Tamil Telugu Turkish Thai Urdu Vietnamese

PRRS Patient Roles and Responsibilities Scale For cancer patients LICENSE THIS MEASURE Overview Language Availability Licensing Selected References Related Measures Overview Overview The Patient Roles and Responsibilities Scale (PRRS) was developed to enable a broader evaluation of the impact of cancer and cancer treatment, measuring ‘real world’ roles and responsibilities such as caring for others and financial and employment responsibilities. Version 2, modified in 2024, removes two items from the Jobs and Careers Subscale. MEASURE NAME: Patient Roles and Responsibilities Scale (PRRS) VERSION: 2 NUMBER OF ITEMS: 16 to 23 PATIENT POPULATION: Cancer patients 18 years and older RECALL PERIOD: Past 7 days RESPONSE SCALE: 5 point Likert-type scale DATA COLLECTION: Paper and electronic ADMINISTRATION: Self-administration and interview when applicable SUBSCALE DOMAINS: Responsibilities and Social Life, Family Well-being, Financial Well-Being, Jobs and Careers TIME FOR COMPLETION: 5-10 minutes SCORING: Manual scoring template RELATED MEASURES: CRRS , FACT-G Caregiver , FACT-G7 DOWNLOAD MEASURE IN ENGLISH DOWNLOAD SCORING DOCUMENT Language Availability Available translations of the PRRS can be obtained when licensing the measure. Users are not permitted to translate the PRRS without prior permission from FACIT.org. Permission may also be contingent upon timeline expectations and availability of FACIT staff. Translations must undergo a rigorous methodology under the guidance of FACIT.org which includes multiple translators and cognitive interviews with patients. For commercial use, FACITtrans is the approved translation vendor of the PRRS. Please contact us for more information. VIEW AVAILABLE LANGUAGES Language Availability Licensing Licensing Licensing fees are assessed on a per trial/per measure basis for commercial use. There is no fee for use of the English version, but a license should be obtained. Non-commercial use is assessed on a case-by-case basis. Licensing fees are typically not applied to investigator-initiated research, students, or clinical use. To license an available version of this measure for commercial or non-commercial use, please complete our registration form . All of the information provided in the form will be kept strictly confidential. For questions, please contact us . LICENSE THIS MEASURE Selected References Selected References Shilling, V., Starkings, R., Jenkins, V. et al. Development and validation of the patient roles and responsibilities scale in cancer patients. Qual Life Res 27 , 2923–2934 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1940-2. LICENSE THIS MEASURE Related Measures Related Measures CRRS Caregiver Roles and Responsibilities Scale LEARN MORE FACT-G Caregiver Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – General – Caregiver Version LEARN MORE FACT-G7 Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General - 7 Item Version LEARN MORE