Below are the details for the FACT-Br measure:
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Brain (FACT-Br)
NUMBER OF ITEMS:
Brain cancer patients 18 years and older
Past 7 days
5 point Likert-type scale
Paper and electronic
Self-administration and interview when applicable
Physical Well-Being, Social/Family Well-Being, Emotional Well-Being, Functional Well-Being, Brain Cancer Subscale
TIME FOR COMPLETION:
Manual scoring template, some items are reverse scored. Subscale scores and total scores possible. SAS/SPSS algorithms available
Available translations of the FACT-Br can be obtained by registering for permission. Users are not permitted to translate the FACT-Br without permission from FACIT.org. Permission from FACIT.org to translate the FACT-Br may also be contingent upon timeline expectations and availability of FACIT staff. Translations must undergo a rigorous methodology under the guidance of FACIT.org which includes multiple translators, QA steps and cognitive interviews with patients. For commercial use, FACITtrans is the approved translation vendor to translate the FACIT measurement system
Please contact us for more information.
Licensing fees are assessed on a per trial/per measure basis for commercial use. There is no fee for use of the English version, but a license should be obtained.
Non-commercial use is assessed on a case-by-case basis. Licensing fees are typically not applied to investigator-initiated research, students, or clinical use.
To license an available version of this measure for commercial or non-commercial use, please complete our registration form. All of the information provided in the form will be kept strictly confidential. For questions, please contact us.
Weitzner, M.A., Meyers, C.A., Gelke, C., Byrne, K., Cella, D.F., & Levin, V.A. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) Scale: Development of a brain subscale and revalidation of the general version (FACT-G) in patients with primary brain tumors. Cancer 1995; 75(5): 1151-1161.
Thavarajah, N., Bedard, G., Zhang, L., Cella, D., Beaumont, J., Tsao, M., Barnes, E., Danjoux, C., Sahgal, A., Soliman, H., & Chow, E. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Brain (FACT-Br) for assessing quality of life in patients with brain metastases: A comparison of recall periods. Journal of Pain Management 2013; 6(3): 223-234.
Thavarajah, N., G., Zhang, L., Cella, D., Beaumont, J. Tsao, M., Barnes, E., Danjoux, C., Sahgal, A., Soliman, H., & Chow, E. Psychometric validation of the functional assessment of cancer therapy—brain (FACT-Br) for assessing quality of life in patients with brain metastases Supportive Care in Cancer2014; 22 (4): 1017-1028. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-2060-8.
Verhaak, E., Schimmel, W. C., Sitskoorn, M. M., Bakker, M., Hanssens, P. E., & Gehring, K. (2019). Multidimensional assessment of fatigue in patients with brain metastases before and after Gamma Knife radiosurgery. Journal of neuro-oncology, 144(2), 377-384.
Verhaak, E., Gehring, K., Hanssens, P. E., & Sitskoorn, M. M. (2019). Health-related quality of life of patients with brain metastases selected for stereotactic radiosurgery. Journal of neuro-oncology, 143(3), 537-546.
Verhaak, E., Schimmel, W. C., Gehring, K., Emons, W. H., Hanssens, P. E., & Sitskoorn, M. M. (2020). Health-related quality of life after Gamma Knife radiosurgery in patients with 1–10 brain metastases. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, 1-11.
Bonomi, A.E., Cella, D.D., Hahn, E.A., Bjordal, K., Sperner, B., Gangeri, L., Bergman, B., Willems, J., Hanquet, P., & Zittoun, R. Multilingual translation of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) quality of life measurement system. Quality of Life Research 1996; 5: 309-320.
Eremenco, S., Arnold, B., Cella, D. A comprehensive method for the translation and cross-cultural validation of health status questionnaires. Evaluation & the Health Professions 2005; 28(2): 212-232.
Webster K., Cella D., Yost K. The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) measurement system: Properties applications, and interpretation. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2003; 1(1): 79-85.
Yost K.J., Eton D.T. Combining distribution- and anchor-based approaches to determine minimally important differences: The FACIT experience. Evaluation & the Health Professions 2005; 28(2): 172-191.